sloptells / typographic quotes

stale · formatting · first recorded 2026-07-02 · registers: hn, cooking, parenting

Models emit “curly” quotes where web-form typists produce "straight" ones — which looks like a tell until you notice the confound: iPhones, Word, Google Docs and every CMS smarten quotes automatically. Our canon of published human prose is full of them. Flagging curly quotes flags devices and editors, not writers — so we don't.

Kept public as a caution, like the em dash: production-pipeline artifacts make terrible evidence.

⚠ also common in good human writing (collateral score 0.55 — the closer to 1, the more it also fires on acclaimed pre-AI prose)

examples

…one of those rare “boring is good” moments…

evidence

occurrences per 10k words, measured 2026-10-26 (run #19, 3 current + 3 vintage models)

current AIvintage AI (2024/25)humans (matched)canon (great pre-AI prose)
pooled92.2511.579.1950.93
hn118.62—17.65
cooking55.93—3.36
parenting124.46—0.40
linkedin21.84——

history

rundateAI /10kvs humans
#22026-07-0276.40×18 vs humans
#32026-07-0291.71×14 vs humans
#42026-07-0674.18×19 vs humans
#52026-07-1370.35×7.8 vs humans
#62026-07-2090.51×24 vs humans
#72026-07-2790.18×15 vs humans
#82026-08-0388.90×14 vs humans
#92026-08-1096.07×15 vs humans
#102026-08-1785.86×15 vs humans
#112026-08-3189.58×15 vs humans
#122026-09-0787.83×11 vs humans
#132026-09-1492.40×34 vs humans
#142026-09-2190.40×15 vs humans
#152026-09-2895.57×16 vs humans
#162026-10-0585.81×15 vs humans
#172026-10-1285.63×13 vs humans
#182026-10-1995.44×17 vs humans
#192026-10-2692.25×10 vs humans

detector

regex: [“”]

sources

← all tells